Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Moon Glow is dimming to nothing

Moon Glow in 2018
One of my self-appointed jobs at Union Station has been to occasionally document the state of the museum's and city's rail cars stored at Ogden Business Depot.

There's some real history out there which, sadly, is being horribly neglected.

There is a couple of wood Saltaire excursion cars slowly moldering away to kindling. The shell of a Bamberger inter-urban rail car that once ran from Ogden to Salt Lake City is rusting away.

Saltaire Excursion Car


But most sad of all, Moon Glow is pretty much done for.

Not that that's anyone's fault.  In the world of historic preservation, triage has to take place: You save what you can.  What you can't save, gets lost. Money is always the key, and saving these things takes a lot of it.

In 2012, when I still worked at the Standard-Examiner, I did a story on the status of the one surviving remnant of the Train Of Tomorrow.  You can read it here (click!). The elevator version is that Moon Glow was one of four cars built by the Union Pacific Railroad to show travelers in the US how amazing rail passenger life was going to be after World War II.

Just one problem: Automobiles.




Americans were increasingly buying and driving them, to the detriment of rails everywhere. As early as the 1920s Ogden's trolly car system was facing stiff competition, and losing. Why take a train when you can drive?

Things got worse in the 1950s. President Eisenhower admired Germany's Autobahn highways so much that he felt the US should have the same thing. Interstate highways were for defense, allegedly, and funded that way, but car drivers loved them.

So the Train of Tomorrow toured the nation in1947, amazed everyone, and then went away. GE, which built it, had trouble even selling it to a major railroad.  UP finally bought it, but it never achieved the nation glory it was aimed at.

Most of the Train of Tomorrow cars were eventually scrapped, but Moon Glow was adopted for use as an office by a scrapping yard in Idaho.  That was where some volunteers from Ogden found it.  They pulled together enough funds to bring it to Utah, and started some preservation work, but it all went south from there.
Moon Glow today.

With no long-term funding in place, each step made matters worse.  Accessories in the car were removed, stored, and lost.  Windows were taken out, stored, and lost.  Buildings that parts of the car were stored in got torn down, and the parts were lost. There was no money to preserve them, no permanent staff anywhere to monitor it.

The viewing dome today. I'm unsure if
the sign is someone's sick joke


It ended up at BDO, first stored in a building. When the building was torn down it was moved to a siding and covered in plastic.  The plastic shredded in the weather, now it sits open to vandals and weather.

Moon Glow's dream

Get the theme here?  Every step of the way it just gets worse and worse. Good intentions are one thing, but a full plan to save it, and the funds to do it, never existed.

When I visited it last week I took more pictures.  As you can see, there's not a lot left. There's a metal shell. The concrete floors are still there, but beyond that it is very efficiently gutted.  Last I heard, renovation would cost $3 million, but really, who knows? 

Moon Glow's reality


What will happen? No clue.  For 15 years Union Station and the museums were managedby the Union Station Foundation, which barely had funds to keep the doors open.  Renovation of collection objects was simply impossible.




Ogden took back management of Union Station, and the collections, a year ago. Does it have these funds?  It has more pressing problems, such as removing asbestos from the Laundry Building next to the station, or upgrading the station's 95 year-old plumbing, or renovating the 95-year-old Union Station itself.

Rusted hulks of bygone rail cars are way down on the list.

I'd much rather see the Saltaire cars saved -- it would be a lot cheaper and they have more Utah connections anyway.

Moon Glow is rail history, and maybe there's a rich guy somewhere who can afford to take it on. Absent that, though, it's time to face the inevitable.




Tuesday, June 11, 2019

In 1872 Women's Lib (sort of) Was the Rule

In 1872, it would appear, women in the LDS Church saw life just a teensy bit differently than the stereotypes of today.

Pro-vote?  Of course.
Equal pay for equal work? Darn right!
Equality under the law in all things?  You better believe it, buster.
Polygamy?  Well, yeah, actually.

OK, so some things are different, but it was 147 years ago and things have changed. Still, it is fascinating to see how they were back then.

I made this little discovery thanks to the efforts of the J. Willard Marriott Library's amazing historical newspapers project, which is working to get every copy of every newspaper eve published in Utah on-line, digitized. If you haven't yet discovered digitalnewspapers.org yet, stop what you are doing and go look at it now.



One of its most recent additions is the complete "Woman's Exponent," which was published from 1872 until 1914. Listed as a "semi-official" publication of the LDS Church, its goal (according to the entry in Wikipedia) to uplift women of the LDS church and to educate women about the women of the LDS Church.

You can read the entire newspaper here:  CLICK LINK.

How closely tied was it to the church?  Its first editor, Louisa Lula Greene, was the grandniece of Church President Brigham Young.

Now, as to the paper's content, as hinted above.

Consider the time: It is 1872 Utah. The state is run by Brigham Young, whose word is law. He sanctions you being made editor of a newspaper aimed at women in Utah. Do you think that you will, for one instant, print something that would not be approved by your grand uncle, let alone the rest of the community?

I bet not. It's rather unlikely.

Which tells me that the women of Utah in 1872 were a lot different in outlook, and expectations, than the women of Utah in the late 20th Century, say, the ones who worked against the Equal Rights Amendment, just to pick one example.

How so?  There's a general tone of "look how amazing women are" in the news coverage, both local and around the world. To wit:

"Springfield, Mass., has elected Miss Sarah J. Williams to be City Physician. Twelve doctors of medicine in pantaloons contended for the honor and emolument of bleeding the Springfield paupers; and wise as they were they were all beaten out of the field by a woman."

Or ponder the ill-suppressed rage in this slap at male dominance: "Society will not tolerate a woman who objects to live with a drunken, brutal husband. She married for better or for worse, and though the man becomes worse, she must pay the penalty. Mrs. Nelson, wife of Joseph Nelson, a blacksmith living near Sedalia, Mo., unable to live with her lawful husband, tried to live away from him. Society said nay. Joseph said no, and made her return. On Sunday the 17th ult. after she had returned home, he killed her. Enlightened society! Exalted husband ... or ought to be!  Happy wife, in a better world!"

But perhaps it is best said in an editorial, unsigned so presumably written by Ms. Greene, that lays out the general principles of the newspaper.



The paper doesn't advocate for women's suffrage, it says, because in Utah they already have it. In a hint that it will not oppose plural marriage, it says the paper has "no particular wrong to contend  against, inflicted up us by our husbands, fathers, brothers, or the male portion of the community; and no special claims to champion, throwing down the gauntlet against all comers...We do not propose to speak for a few of the women of Utah who with disappointed hopes or perverted minds may be disposed to rail in bitterness against the principles, honestly entertained by a whole community."

OK, so "don't rock the boat" as editorial policy.

But, in another editorial on the following page, Ms. Greene takes a more proactive tac for the rights she thinks women should have.

How about access to jobs?  Not all women have husbands to care for them, and yet society prevents them from having good paying jobs, and makes it clear this is why some women are forced into prostitution.

"She  should have the right to live, and live purely, and not be compelled by the force of custom and fortuitous circumstances to seek a living death that the physical body might be sustained. And to secure her this right, she should have access to every avenue of employment for which she has physical and mental capacity."

Equality under the law?

"She should not be held more responsible than man -- if as much -- for sexual crime. As the world goes if she sins and falls the ban of society is placed upon her, she is ostracized and driven deeper into a course of wickedness, while her partner in guilt, her tempter and destroyer, walks erect and unabashed, received, encouraged and it may be petted by those of her own sex who would spurn her as an unclean and loathsome thing. He should be held equally degraded -- more so, as more culpable, and deserving the severe penalty."



The right to vote?  They can in Utah (a right they lost with statehood), but this paper argues strongly for the right for all, a right now denied "simply because nature qualified them to become mothers and not fathers of men.

"They may own property, pay taxes, assist in supporting the government, rend their heart-strings in giving for its aid the children of  their affections, but they are denied all right to say who shall disburse those taxes, how that government shall be conducted, or who shall decide on a question of peace or war which may involve the lives of their sons, brothers, fathers and husbands."

Susan B. Anthony couldn't have said it better, but a Utah Mormon woman said it in 1872.

The Woman's Exponent folded in 1914 due to financial pressures.














Thursday, January 31, 2019

Of Course Racism Rode the Rails to Promontory

The Transcontinental Railroad was a massive disruption  to many populations in the American West: self-sufficient communities discovered the wonders and costs of cheap imports, crime soared as rough railroad workers roamed and plundered, and folks who "don't look like us" were suddenly everywhere.

And racism, let's be blunt here, was the norm. Newspaper accounts almost identified race except for northern Europeans. Black, Greeks, Italians and others all got their "race" mentioned. A railroad gang supervisor will describe his workers as "three Greeks, two Italians, and five whites," and not think anything is amiss at all.

Especially the Chinese.

"Celestials," as they were commonly referred to, had three strikes against them right from the get-go: They looked different, they worked harder and better, and they were willing to work cheap.

Well, I hear you saying, "no wonder they were hated. Better work and cheaper? Can't have any of that!"

Mural showing Chinese workers building Transcontinental Railroad in Ogden's Union Station


And hated they were.

Race was part of it, but so was the economic disruption they caused. Sure, they built the Central Pacific's part of the Transcontinental Railroad, but what -- you can hear the nation asking -- have you done for us lately?

In 1885 a camp of Chinese workers hired by the Union Pacific to mine coal and maintain the rails was attacked by residents of Rock Springs, Wyoming. The resulting riot left 28 Chinese dead, more injured, and the survivors fleeing into the wilderness for their lives.

Folks were asking this in May of 1869, just weeks after the railroad was finished.

On May 26, 1869, the dust had barely settled when the Deseret News ran what looks like an editorial, but that is unsigned, raising the question of what to do with all those folks from China. The arguments, pro and con, sounds surprisingly similar to debates going on in 2019.

"The completion of the great continental highway ... is likely to force the question of Chinese labor upon the attention of the country," it says. California is already dealing with it, where "many see little to hope but much to fear from the influx of the Chinese. If their views be correct, it is a peril which not only menaces California, but the whole country."

Indeed, the road of iron put every part of the nation within days' reach of the peril.

What is the danger? "They have come by thousands to California, and though driven from the mines that Americans and Europeans deem valuable, they contrive to live and save money by working in the streams and placers which the dominant race has deserted."

Unlikely to be satisfied with gold mine leavings, this article says, the Chinese "will set eastward. The force of circumstances will push it in this direction."
Statue honoring Chinese workers, Utah Railroad Museum.

And where the Chinese go, others will suffer. "The European laborer in the East will not work for less than two or three dollars a day; but the Chinaman will work for less than a dollar."

Not only that, but the Chinaman "is frugal and patient, and as industrious as a beaver. He will live where one of the so-called superior race would starve. His food is a little rice, and he eats meat but seldom. He indulges in no dissipation; but is simple, abstinent and very economical."

One would think employers would value such people. The CPRR sure did.

"The San Francisco Times says there are Chinamen who have been on that work who are better at aligning roads than many white men who have been educated in the business, and they will strike a truer line with the unassisted eye than most white men can with the use of instruments."

And so on. In a tunnel-drilling competition between gangs of Chinese and Irishmen "bets were freely made that the white men would come out winners, but at the end of the day, when the work of each party was measured, it was found that the Chinamen had burrowed further into the rock that the others and were, moreover, less fatigued."

The presence of such workers "will inevitably work a great revolution in labor," the article notes."Works will be accomplished which, without their aid, and as labor now costs, would be left unattempted. They are adept for almost any species of labor."

And yet, the article says, politicians and governments everywhere torment and discriminate against them. "Their popularity depends upon refusing them every privilite and right which other races, however profligate and worthless members of them may be, enjoy to the fullest extent."

In California, it says, "they are chased, abused, robbed and abominably maltreated by men and boys, their terror affording only amusement, and even the dogs are set upon and taught to bite them."

The article then takes an interesting turn, also paralleling debate today.

"And yet those who thus torture this race call themselves Christian," it says, "and mock and denounce them as idolators and heathens."

Deed, not example, is the key, it says, to those who wonder why the Chinese resent the way they are treated.

"Men may prate to them about American civilization, free and enlightened institutions, the spirit of progress and advanced Christianity until doomsday, but they will fail to respect or attach any value to these high-sounding phrases and professions while they are treated like wild beasts."

The article urges this course, although it does stop short of calling for actual equality.

"These Asiatics are willing to work, and work cheap at any kind of drudgery," he says. "If the Anglo-Saxon is the superior being which he affects to be, he can with safety assume the direction of this class of laborers. He can employ them to goo advantage and, instead of living a life of drudgery himself, he can cultivate his brain and direct and manage their labor to his own and their advantage."

So it's still racially-charged, but it's being nice, not mean, and that ought to count for something.

"If he treat them kindly, and pay them honestly, he will do more to convert them to his religion and ways than years of preaching with a contrary practice would do, and he need not be afraid that their degradation, vices or barbarism will hurt him."

Folks stayed afraid.  The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 suspended immigration for decades. The Rock Springs massacre was, sadly, typical.









Monday, November 26, 2018

The Ogden Christmas Shopping Experience of Yore

When I moved to Ogden in 1978 I caught the tail end of what used to be the typical Ogden downtown Christmas shopping experience.

The day after Thanksgiving the corner of 24th and Washington Boulevard was a total zoo.  A Christmas decoration of some sort was suspended over the middle of the intersection, strung from cables stretched across from ZCMI to the Eccles Building. There were so many cars going every direction at once that a cop had to stand in the middle of the intersection, directing traffic. He looked hot and bothered with it all.

1950 Washington Blvd.
And stores still lined the streets. The Ogden City Mall hadn't take out the entire two-block area from 24th to 22nd Streets yet, ZCMI and Fred M. Nye were still booming, the streets were jammed because there were no shopping malls to siphon buyers away. I had to fight crowds to get into ZCMI, where harried clerks were dealing with mobs of folks.

1978 was the tail-end. The 'vard was already heavily spotted with empty store-fronts. To really see what it was like, I'd need a Wayback machine to 1950.

Looking at the City Directory for 1951 between 23rd Street and 24th Street alone there are dozens of shops and businesses: Madsen Furniture Company, L.C. West and Son Jeweler, Christensen's Shoe Mart, Thom McAn Shoes, Rich's Women's Clothes, J. J. Newberry Department Store, Hartley's Hobbyline, Grayson's Women's Clothing, Boston Shoe Shop, Taylor-Wright Department Store, Tribe's Home Furnishings, Pay Less Drug Store, Woolworth department store, W. T Grant Department Store, the Heap O'Beauty Salon, and J. C. Penney.

That's not all of them and that's just one block.

People always wax nostalgic for the way it used to be, but they were quick to abandon all that for free parking and indoor warmth, which was why Ogden's city parents were looking at, yes, The Mall.

Shopping malls killed downtown, but they were just another spin of the cycle.

I remember, vividly, my first visit to the Cottonwood Mall out in Holladay. It was new and glittering and being the holiday season, the mall was bedecked with Christmas glory, glittering and shiny.

That mall was a magnet, with lovely stores of all levels. I worked for 6 months selling cameras at J.C. Penney, eating lunch at Woolworths, buying books at the little book store. There was even a stamp shop where I bought stamp hinges and 1-penny blacks from England.

That mall is now a giant hole in the ground.

The Ogden City Mall started out the same way -- glittering and huge, an intended shopping magnet for cities in Utah, Idaho and others points around the compass. At Christmas time we jammed into the lobby and listened to the Ogden Symphony Orchestra play, at in the horrendously positioned food court and wished we could afford the stuff in Nordstrom's.

I don't recall anyone being nostalgic for the traffic jams at 24th and Washington. That cop, I'm sure, was glad they were gone.

But a few years later they opened the Newgate Mall. Then the Layton Hills Mall opened -- anyone know how that's doing? I haven't been there in years.

The radio, today, had a show of folks discussing shopping malls and how they seem to be dying. Folks are reminiscing about meeting lovers there, having lovely experiences of wandering and looking and so on.

But those are memories unique to a specific incident. They ignore the daily life experience, which was far less romantic.

Nobody waxes nostalgic about having to wander mall parking lots for hours, or having their car broken into, or getting shoved around inside the mall, or having to wander all over, whining child in tow, looking for a rest room.

Wouldn't it be nice if I could do all this from home?

Actually, yes it is. Which is why I'm writing this on Cyber Monday.
Debbie Wade Pinterest image.

This is the day everyone hits the computer to do their Christmas shopping and business owners all over nation ponder their stores' heating and light bills and say bad words. They have especially choice words for the folks buying stuff on-line today who researched the stuff in their store on Friday.

It's odd, in a way, that we've come full circle.

The first national department store chains -- Woolworth and J. C. Penney, were barely 50 years old in 1950. If you go back 100 years ago there were downtowns and department stores, yes, but most folks lived in rural settings, farms and small towns, and couldn't shop there.

They did their shopping "on-line" through the catalog.

Sears made it possible for folks hours away from town to buy through the mail (its day's on-line experience) and bypass the limited and higher-priced local general store.

And now we're back again.

So I suppose, if you want to strike a blow for nostalgia, and make America great again, or something, you could do no less than hit Amazon and get that chrome plated dingleblat you've always wanted, but it doesn't feel the same, somehow.

Your memorable shopping experience has to be one you make. If you want, in years from now, to wax nostalgic about how fun it was to bump around in crowds, feel the chill and enjoy the warmth and cold of shops, it means you need to get your buns off the chair and out the door.

Shop keepers are waiting, anxious.

And when I did my shopping down on 25th Street some of the stores even had free cookies. All had smiles and greetings from actual human beings.

Let's see Amazon do that.










Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Ogden loses another legend--Karen Waters RIP

I guess I'm at the age where folks I covered are now dying, but it is never fun to see.

Karen Waters is -- and should remain -- a legend along Ogden's 25th Street. As much as anyone, she played a key role in revitalizing Two-Bit Street.

Her small initial cafe, located under where the City Club is now, was small but comfortable, with great food and a constant crowd. Wednesdays were the hardest to get in because that was when they had meat loaf or pot roast, alternating weeks, and you were wise to call ahead and reserve your portions of those two commodities.

She always celebrated Elvis' Birthday by serving up free fried peanut and banana sandwiches. She had a thing for Elvis that would have made her husband jealous if Elvis weren't allegedly dead. One time I was talking to her about him and she started fanning herself, admitting that she was getting just a titch hot and bothered talking about him.

Karen fought numerous battles with the city in order to stay open. She had to struggle just to keep barrel-half planters in front of her store. It seemed as if zoning and building inspectors just didn't want her to be there some times, but she persisted.

Her cafe was what a cafe ought to be--hot coffee, good food, a steady stream of regulars who'd hang out, kill time and joke with the wait staff. Those included the odd (yes, very odd) journalist, who missed no opportunity to write up the place. Hey, everyone needs a publicity agent and, no, I never took free meals.

Local politicians were also regulars -- I need to dig it out, but I did one column when a local lawmaker died who'd been a friend. She hung his cowboy hat on the wall in his memory, I thought it was nice and wrote about it, and she hung the column next to the hat.

That hat and column followed her down the street to her new, much larger, cafe, and always hung there. I felt honored every visit.

Karen's key role in 25th Street exploded when she opened that new place -- it is now Jesse Jean's Coffee Beans -- in the 100 block. She was right next to a newly opened Ogden Blue in buildings the city had just put up, and she lived in an apartment upstairs.  The place was jammed from the word go and the whole street took off. Meat loaf, pot roast and her famous crummy chicken were always there.

Karen's new cafe was filled with memorabilia of her family -- family pictures were imbedded into the plastic of the counter, and it breaks my heart to think of them all tossed out when the interior was demolished.

But all things come to an end. Karen's health declined, and she just couldn't keep up the business. Restaurants are hard to run, you need to be healthy to fight the battle, and after a while it just didn't work any more.

All things change, but it's sad when they do. I hope Karen's afterlife is filled with fun customers to talk to, lots of that amazing meat loaf (I'm guessing the recipe died with her) and, every now and then, some thoughts about Elvis, just to keep her warm.

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Murdered, Missing Dad Found In Ogden 45 Years Later


I got a note on facebook on Father's Day from a lady in Minnesota asking for help finding her dad.

"My name is Tamara Hergert," she said in one of those little Facebook message thingies which just showed up. "And you don't know me. I was speaking to someone who has lived in Ogden, UT. all her life and she pointed me in your direction.

"In January 1973 my father, Willard Thomas Hobart, was murdered on 25th. He was stabbed in the lungs, which resulted in his death."

And that was all she knew.

I didn't know Tamara from Adam, and have no clue who referred her to me, but if there's one thing I enjoy it is a hunt. Dead people aren't usually very hard to find either; they tend to stay in one place. But this was complicated by the facts of the case -- there was no immediate family in town when Hobart died, he seemed to be a transient, so the county would have buried him, perhaps?

Perhaps.

Tamera said her dad had a very troubled 46 years of life. He left home at an early age after his mother married a second husband who told his mother she had to choose between her children or him, and she picked him. Willard and a brother and sister all jumped a train to California.

Her father joined the Navy during World War II, married afterwards, had a child, divorced and ended up in Denver, where he married Tamara's mother.

"1958 was a tough year for him," she said. "A lot of changes. Married in January, a father again in December, " and then to have that child, a son, die accidentally.

"And he also suffered from serious shell shock, PTSD as we call it now. It was too much for him and he drank to cope."

When drinking, he'd disappear for long periods, then come back. He struggled, but the addiction won. "One day he went away and never came back again."

"We don't know how he wound up in Ogden. It's the final piece to a puzzle I will be working to put together for some time. But he wasn't a bad man. Just a human being who got lost in the pain of living."

She found out he was in Ogden by putting his name into Google, which turns up a news story in Standard-Examiner from Jan. 6, 1973.  Willard Thomas Hobart, that story says, was found stabbed in room 2 of the Helena Hotel, which still stands on 25th Street. Police arrested a suspect, Hobart died at St. Benedict's Hospital.

What happened to him next? My first thought was the cemeteries.

I went to the Ogden City Cemetery because I figured a pauper's funeral might be held there.  No dice.  The sexton there said Aultorest did a lot of those too, try there?

I did. No dice again.

Meanwhile, I'd asked Police  Chief Randy Watt for help. By some miracle did they still have the police report on this crime?

Folks: Miracles happen. Yes they did. On Microfiche.

Randy said the report indicated that Lindquist Funeral Home took the body to the medical examiner's office, and assumed that they'd handled things after that. They were next on my list, so I visited their offices.

Sure enough. A quick search of their records -- which are on paper files in the basement -- found that Lindquist had, indeed, taken care of Mr. Hobart. Their files indicated that they'd found enough ID with him to get his Social Security and veterans information, but had been unable to locate his immediate family.

So, using $253 from Social Security, and $250 from the Veterans Administration, he was cremated and interred.

Did they know where? Sure: A quick run to Washington Heights found him in Greenlawn 2, space 138 A, right next to Washington Boulevard.

There is no marker on the grave, but I was able to walk right to the spot. It has a lovely view looking east. The cemetery folk said it would be their pleasure to help Tamara put a marker there.

Tamara sent me a logbook of her dad's ship in the U.S. Navy, the USS General Leroy Eltinge (AP-154), a transport that had a brief career. In includes full crew photos and there's her dad in Division H. He's got what she describes as a "goofy smile" on his face and looks a lot like her own children. It is, she says, the best photo she has of him.


Why did he end up in Ogden? As I told Tamara, Two-Bit Street then was the classic Skid Row. Ogden was a national rail hub, so no matter where Hobart was going, if he was bumming rides on trains he would have to go through Ogden. The Helena was one of several low-cost places on the street.

His final moments were tragic. The police report, and news accounts, are pretty spare on detals.  Apparently nobody felt a strong need to go into detail about the death of a transient.

The police report says the officer on the beat was called to the Helena because of a stabbing. In Room 2 he found Hobart laying "on his back across the bed with his feet on the floor. His shirt had been removed by an unknown person. Victim was unconscious and a would giving the appearance of a knife would was apparent on the upper left. Wound was bleeding heavily."

Two other men were in the room, but both were drunk and not much help.

A suspect, James Hare, was apprehended nearby. He had a hunting knife on him and, the report says, "freely admitted stabbing victim with malice and forethought."

Subsequent news stories didn't say much more. Mr. Hare eventually pled guilty to a slightly lesser charge and was given five-to-life.

Tamara is making plans to visit Ogden this summer. She wants to visit her dad and put a marker on his grave. I am very happy I was able to help her do that.







Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Government enforced racism: Nothing new. Just ask Chinese

Listening to racist rants in the daily news, it would be easy to think that we're rapidly declining in civility, but an argument could be made that we're actually just standing still.

Even the language has stayed the same. The same tape gets played over and over.

Consider the Chinese.

Those poor sods built the railroad, filling in the gaps of a massive labor shortage on the West Coast to dig tunnels through the Sierra Nevada mountains and across the dry flats of Nevada and Utah. They came here hoping to find work, a life.

And what sort of thanks do they get? The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, renewed a decade later and not finally repealed until 1943.

The act itself was pretty mean, but it reflected massive hatred and fear of an entire ethnic group. Chinese were viewed as (and this ought to sound familiar) bringers of disease, poverty, low wages and crime.



They were hounded out of the country, discriminated against, robbed by officials and, in more than one occasion, slaughtered.

The slaughter occurred right next door to Ogden, over in Rock Springs.

The Rock Springs Massacre, in 1885, started because the Union Pacific Railroad had hired a bunch of the Chinese at lower wages than they were paying white laborers. The whites resented losing their jobs, and resented the lower sages their jobs were paying, and attacked the Chinese.  In the end 28 were killed and more than 70 of their homes burned. Federal troops had to come in to quiet things down.

(This sort of game playing by corporations is not at all unusual. In the book "Grapes of Wrath" John Steinbeck describes the tactic of California fruit growers who tell poor farmers in Oklahoma there's lots of work to be had in California. Driven by their homes by the Dust Bowl, those farmers -- the Oakies -- flood California, driving down wages and earning resentment by locals.

(It always interests me that people don't blame the corporations who are playing this game instead of the poor sods who are so desperate for work they take the lower wages. Anyway ...)


What got me thinking about this was wandering through some old Ogden Standards on microfilm this morning and I happened across a story about the Chinese Exclusion Act, defending it and making it clear why the act was needed.

As you might expect, the language is not legalese, or even diplomatic. To pass a bill that is blatantly racist and fear mongering, you have to use language that appeals to those instinct. The folks you are excluding have to be dehumanized, made evil, made undesirable.

And so it is.

This particular story, which ran in the Ogden Daily Standard on March 5, 1891, reports on debate in a Congressional hearing about the progress of the Act,  and the question of whether to renew it. It was approved nine years earlier and was set to expire.

Numbers of Chinese are decreasing, the congressional committee is told by this report, but not as fast as they'd like "this being due to the difficulty in enforcing the law."

It seems Chinese are sneaking in across Puget Sound from Canada. Once here, they have the temerity to use the courts to get out, "dwelling particularly upon the practice by Chinamen of getting out on writs of habeas corpus and giving worthless bonds as security."

"The report expresses the opinion that if the present law was strictly enforced it would not be long before the Chinese race in the United States would be extinct. The Chinese quarter in San Francisco is spoken of as a pest breeder which should not be tolerated in any American community. Chinese are inveterate gamblers and their lotteries, the report says, flourish to such an extent that it seems impossible that such a state of affairs could exist except with connivance with the authorities.

"The Chinaman is described as having his good qualities and being industrious, but the committee is of the opinion that to rescind the Chinese act would surely result in the whole Pacific Coast being overrun with Chinese with resultant serious labor troubles."

The act stayed in force until 1943. It is interesting we were finally allowing Chinese to enter at the same time as the country was herding all its Japanese residents -- immigrant, citizen,  or native born or whatever -- into concentration camps based solely on their race.